![Quirijn Meijnen advocaat: Leopold Meijnen Oosterbaan advocaten: Adidas A.G. vs OHIM and Shoe Branding Europe BVBA Decision General Court 21 May 2015 Case T‑145/14, three stripes and third time lucky Quirijn Meijnen advocaat: Leopold Meijnen Oosterbaan advocaten: Adidas A.G. vs OHIM and Shoe Branding Europe BVBA Decision General Court 21 May 2015 Case T‑145/14, three stripes and third time lucky](http://4.bp.blogspot.com/-obB4_J13LP4/VWWjxW5f74I/AAAAAAAAGrU/SOrgKLLZaBE/s1600/Naamloos5.png)
Quirijn Meijnen advocaat: Leopold Meijnen Oosterbaan advocaten: Adidas A.G. vs OHIM and Shoe Branding Europe BVBA Decision General Court 21 May 2015 Case T‑145/14, three stripes and third time lucky
![Adidas & Coca Cola: Two decisions of the EU courts dealing with the Community trade mark | TTLF Newsletter on Transatlantic Antitrust and IPR Developments Adidas & Coca Cola: Two decisions of the EU courts dealing with the Community trade mark | TTLF Newsletter on Transatlantic Antitrust and IPR Developments](https://ttlfnews.files.wordpress.com/2016/03/2016-01_02.jpg?w=584)
Adidas & Coca Cola: Two decisions of the EU courts dealing with the Community trade mark | TTLF Newsletter on Transatlantic Antitrust and IPR Developments
![Wrong side of the line - more absolute grounds rejections for stripe marks of K-Swiss Inc and Shoe Branding Europe BVBA - IP Whiteboard Wrong side of the line - more absolute grounds rejections for stripe marks of K-Swiss Inc and Shoe Branding Europe BVBA - IP Whiteboard](http://ipwhiteboard.com.au/wp-content/uploads/2016/01/K-Swiss-5-stripe-CTM.png)
Wrong side of the line - more absolute grounds rejections for stripe marks of K-Swiss Inc and Shoe Branding Europe BVBA - IP Whiteboard
![Quirijn Meijnen advocaat: Leopold Meijnen Oosterbaan advocaten: Adidas A.G. vs OHIM and Shoe Branding Europe BVBA Decision General Court 21 May 2015 Case T‑145/14, three stripes and third time lucky Quirijn Meijnen advocaat: Leopold Meijnen Oosterbaan advocaten: Adidas A.G. vs OHIM and Shoe Branding Europe BVBA Decision General Court 21 May 2015 Case T‑145/14, three stripes and third time lucky](http://4.bp.blogspot.com/-YsVXCu8S0MI/VWWlXSYcNuI/AAAAAAAAGrw/bPSoLGbcgzI/s1600/Adidas-logo-Wallpaper-29.jpg)
Quirijn Meijnen advocaat: Leopold Meijnen Oosterbaan advocaten: Adidas A.G. vs OHIM and Shoe Branding Europe BVBA Decision General Court 21 May 2015 Case T‑145/14, three stripes and third time lucky
Case T-145/14: Judgment of the General Court of 21 May 2015 — adidas v OHIM — Shoe Branding Europe (Two parallel stripes on
Case C-396/15 P: Appeal brought on 21 July 2015 by Shoe Branding Europe BVBA against the judgment of the General Court (Seventh
![The General Court of the EU Confirms that Adidas' “Three Parallel Equidistant Stripes” EU Figurative Trade Mark is Devoid of Distinctiveness – SCRIPTed The General Court of the EU Confirms that Adidas' “Three Parallel Equidistant Stripes” EU Figurative Trade Mark is Devoid of Distinctiveness – SCRIPTed](https://script-ed.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/08/mancinella_fig3.png)